Judicial Control as a Guarantee of Non-Interference in Private Life During the Pretrial Investigation. An Observation under the European Court of Human Rights
| Autor | Volodymyr I. Galagan, Serhii Ye. Ablamskyi, Zh?nn? V. Udovenko, Victoria V. Ablamska |
| Cargo | Doctor of Law, Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Law and Law of Criminal Procedure, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (Kyiv, Ukraine). orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8224-0099 - Ph.D. in Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Organization of Pre-Trial Investigation, ... |
| Páginas | 1-18 |
DIXI
Research article. https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-5891.2021.02.12
1 Doctor of Law, Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Law and Law of Criminal
Procedure, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (Kyiv, Ukraine).
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8224-0099
2 Ph.D. in Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal
Procedure and Organization of Pre-Trial Investigation, Kharkiv National University of Internal
Affairs (Kharkiv, Ukraine).
E-mail: ablamu4@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4716-3985
3 Ph.D. in Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and
Law of Criminal Procedure, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (Kyiv, Ukraine).
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4100-0723
4 , Kharkiv National University
of Internal Affairs (Kharkiv, Ukraine).
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2415-7235
Judicial control as a guarantee
of non-interference in private life
during the pre-trial investigation:
An observation under the
European Court of Human Rights
El control judicial como garantía de no injerencia en la vida privada durante la
instrucción: Una observación en el marco del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos
Controle judicial como garantia de não-interferência na vida privada durante
a investigação pré-julgamento: Uma observação no âmbito do Tribunal Europeu
de Direitos Humanos
Volodymyr I. Galagan1
Serhii Ye. Ablamskyi2
Zhаnnа V. Udovenko3
Victoria V. Ablamska4
Received: March 3rd, 2021
Accepted: April 4th, 2021
Published: July 6th, 2021
How to cite this article:
Volodymyr I. Galagan, Serhii Ye. Ablamskyi, Zhаnnа V. Udovenko & Victoria V. Ablamska.
Judicial control as a guarantee of non-interference in private life during
the pre-trial investigation: An observation under the European Court of Human Rights.
DIXI, vol. 23, n°. 2, julio-diciembre 2021, 1-18.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-5891.2021.02.12
2Judicial control as a guarantee of non-interference in private life during the pre-trial investigation:
An observation under the European Court of Human Rights
DIXI e-ISSN 2357-5891 / Vol. 23, n.° 2 / julio-diciembre 2021 / Bucaramanga, Colombia
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
Abstract
The article is devoted to the topical issue of judicial control over non-interference in the private (personal and
family) life of participants in criminal proceedings. The study was conducted in the context of the analysis of
the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, the legal positions of which should be consistently applied
in criminal proceedings; evidence of this are the legal requirements on this issue. The notion and concept of
judicial control is a necessity component that helps to guarantee the respect of human dignity and integrity.
It is a common and established principle that, during the pre-trial process, it is the position of those ensuring
justice in making sure that the life of people is respected and safeguarded. It is noted that in accordance with
the national legislation of Ukraine, judicial control is a separate function of the court’s activities at the stage of
pre-trial investigation, directly carried out by the investigating judge. The situation will become precarious and
detrimental when the private life of people is not respected to the fullest.
Therefore, it is the responsibility of those ensuring public order during the pre-trial investigation phase to ensu-
re the respect of the private life of the presumed suspect for the proper implementation of the justice process.
In ensuring this right, it is established that the empirical and analytical methods of research are necessary, in
order to show the effective role played by the European Court of Human Rights in respecting the right to private
his/her private life is at stake, and it always affects the extent of the justice system.
European Court of Human Rights, judicial control, non-interference, pre-trial investigation, private
life.
Resumen
El artículo está dedicado a la cuestión de actualidad del control judicial sobre la no injerencia en la vida privada
(personal y familiar) de los participantes en los procesos penales. El estudio se ha realizado en el contexto del
análisis de la práctica del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos, cuyas posiciones jurídicas deben aplicarse
de forma coherente en los procesos penales; prueba de ello son los requisitos legales sobre esta cuestión. La
noción y el concepto de control judicial es un componente necesario que contribuye a garantizar el respeto
de la dignidad y la integridad humanas. Es un principio común y establecido que, durante el proceso previo al
juicio, es la posición de aquellos que aseguran la justicia en hacer que la vida de las personas sea respetada
y salvaguardada. Cabe señalar que, de acuerdo con la legislación nacional de Ucrania, el control judicial es
una función separada de las actividades del tribunal en la fase de investigación previa al juicio, llevada a cabo
directamente por el juez de instrucción. La situación será precaria y perjudicial cuando no se respete al máximo
la vida privada de las personas.
Por lo tanto, es responsabilidad de quienes velan por el orden público durante la fase de investigación previa al
juicio garantizar el respeto de la vida privada del presunto sospechoso para el correcto desarrollo del proceso
de justicia. Para garantizar este derecho, se establece que los métodos empíricos y analíticos de la investiga-
Humanos en el respeto del derecho a la vida privada durante la fase de interrogatorio de la investigación. De
las conclusiones se desprende que, aunque el Tribunal ha desempeñado un papel destacado y pertinente en
juego, y ello afecta siempre al alcance del sistema judicial.
Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos, control judicial, no injerencia, investigación previa al
juicio, vida privada.
Para continuar leyendo
Solicita tu prueba