Ethics guidelines
| Páginas | 184-187 |
Ethics guidelines
Estud.filos | Universidad de Antioquia | ISSN 0121-3628 | ISSN-e 2256-358X
Ethics guidelines
1. Introduction: Focus and scope of Estudios de Filosofía
Estudios de Filosofíais the journal published by the Institute of Philosophy of the Universidad de
Antioquia. It is an international peer-reviewed, open-access, electronic journal and adheres to the
policy of double-blind peer review. Since its foundation in 1990, Estudios de Filosofía has been devoted
to fostering the research in all elds of philosophy. The journal publishes papers in Spanish and English.
The purpose of publishing these code of ethics is to indicate the expectations of the journal and
of the Institute of Philosophy regarding the publishing ethics, having as a referent the theme, focus
and scope of the journal. This code presents basic ethical standards for authors and reviewers, and
also points out schematically the functions and responsibilities of the editor.
2. Editorial Structure
Estudios de Filosofía is coordinated by one director, who at the same time coordinates the (general
or guest) editor, the editorial assistant, the designer and the editorial team. The director is appointed
by the director of the Institute of Philosophy. The director is the main responsible for the journal. The
editor determines the theme of each issue and evaluates the thematic relevance and quality of each
article submied to the journal before sending it to review. The editorial assistant and the editorial
commiee support the editor by reviewing potentially publishable material, as well as by suggesting
external reviewers. The designer is responsible for the style and format of the journal. Finally, the
editor is in charge of the nal version of each published issue of Estudios de Filosofía.
3. General Obligations and Responsibilities of the Director
The director is responsible for
3.1. Working to satisfy the necessities of both readers and authors.
3.2. Trying to improve constantly the journal.
3.3. Put in place processes to ensure the quality of the published material.
3.4. Defending free speech.
3.5. The integrity of the academic archive.
3.6. Opposing to mercantile tendencies that may compromise the intellectual and ethical standards
of the journal.
3.7. Being always willing to publish corrections, clarications, retractions and apologies when
necessary.
Para continuar leyendo
Solicita tu prueba