Estados mentales dominantes de los militares: parámetros, estructura, interdependencia de los factores
Autor | Ihor Popovych, Larysa Stepanenko, Oleksandr Savchuk, Nataliia Zavatska, Iryna Koval |
Cargo | Ihor Popovych, Kherson State University, Kherson, Ukraine. Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Full Professor, Full Professor of the Department of Psychology, Kherson State University, Kherson, Ukraine. Larysa Stepanenko, SHEI 'Donbas State Pedagogical University', Sloviansk, Ukraine. Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, ... |
Páginas | 239-250 |
Volume 11 - Issue 49
/ January 2022
239
htt ps: // w ww.a maz onia inve sti ga.i nfo I SSN 232 2- 630 7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.49.01.26
How to Cite:
Popovych, I., Stepanenko, L., Savchuk, O., Zavatska, N., & Koval, I. (2022). Estados mentales dominantes de los militares:
parámetros, estructura, interdependencia de los factores. Amazonia Investiga, 11(49), 239-250.
https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.49.01.26
Estados mentales dominantes de los militares: parámetros, estructura,
interdependencia de los factores
Servicemen’s dominant mental states: parameters, structure, and factor interdependence
Received: November 28, 2021 Accepted: January 15, 2022
Written by:
Ihor Popovych103
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1663-111X
Larysa Stepanenko104
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2891-9006
Oleksandr Savchuk105
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8309-5927
Nataliia Zavatska106
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8148-0998
Iryna Koval107
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2788-6345
Resumen
El objetivo del artículo es fundamentar
teóricamente y estudiar empíricamente los
estados mentales dominantes de los militares que
sirven en el ejército, algunos de los cuales
participaron en operaciones militares; determinar
los parámetros, estudiar la estructura y la
interdependencia de los factores. Se utilizó las
herramientas de psicodiagnóstico que reflejaron
de manera relevante el sujeto y el objeto de la
investigación. Se interpretó cualitativamente los
estados mentales dominantes de los encuestados,
se aclaró el número óptimo de f actores de la
investigación y se describió las características
semánticas psicológicas del fenómeno estudiado.
El análisis factorial ANOVA permitió
determinar la estructura de los estados mentales
dominantes de los encuestados, que combina
siete estados actuales (F1-F7), lo que constituye
el 71.651% de la dispersión. El más importante
de la estructura factorial es F4 “La Dominación
pragmática”, que tiene más interrelaciones (n =
4) y la conexión más estable con F1 (rs=.333;
p≤.01). Se argumentó que los parámetros
Abstract
The aim of the article was to theoretically
substantiate and empirically investigate the
dominant mental states of servicemen, some of
whom participated in hostilities; and also to set
parameters, to study the structure and
interdependence of factors. Psychodiagnostic
methods that were relevant to the subject and object
of research were used. The respondents’ dominant
mental states were qualitatively interpreted, the
optimal number of research factors was determined,
and the psychological content features of the
studied phenomenon were described. The ANOVA
factor analysis determined the structure of the
respondents’ dominant mental states, w hich
combined seven current states (F1 – F7), accounting
for 71.651 % of the dispersion. It is established that
F4 “pragmatic dominance” is the most important in
the factor structure, with the most associations (n =
4); it is emphasized that the correlation between F4
and F1 is the most stable (rs=.333; p≤.01). It has
been substantiated that psychological parameters,
structure, and the interdependence of factors are key
components in the resolution of service, tactical,
fire, and combat activities. The results of the study
103
Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Full Professor, Full Professor of the Department of Psychology, Kherson State University,
Kherson, Ukraine.
104
Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, SHEI “Donbas State Pedagogical
University”, Sloviansk, Ukraine.
105
Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Senior Researcher, Department of Philosophy, Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National University
of Air Force, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
106
Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Full Professor, Hea d of the Department of Practical Psychology and Social Work, Volodymyr
Dahl East-Ukrainian National University, Severodonetsk, Ukraine.
107
Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Full Professor of Department of Medical Psychology, Psychosomatic
Medicine and Psychotherapy, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Para continuar leyendo
Solicita tu prueba