Referências bibliográficas
| Autor | Luis Enrique Sánchez |
| Páginas | 457-475 |
457
REFERÊN
C
IA
S
BIBLI
OG
RÁF
I
CAS
AB’SÁBER, A. N. Diretrizes para uma política de preserva
ç
ão de reservas naturais no Estado de
São
Paulo
.
G
eogra
a e
p
lanejamento,
v
.
30
,
p
. 1-
8
, 1
9
77.
ABBRUZZE
S
E
,
B.
;
S
.
G
. LEIB
O
WITZ. A synoptic approach
f
or assessing cumulative impacts to Wetlands.
E
nv
i
ronmenta
l
management,
v
.
2
1, n.
3
, p. 457-475, 1
997
.
A
G
RA
FILHO, S. S. Situação atual e perspectivas da avaliação de impacto ambiental no Brasil. In:
SÁN CHEZ , L. E . (Org .).
A
va
li
ação
d
e
i
mpacto am
bi
enta
l
: s
i
tuação atua
l
e perspect
i
va
s
.
S
ão Paulo: Epusp,
1993
. p. 15
3
-15
6
.
A
HAMMED
,
R
.
;
H
ARVEY
, N. Evaluation o
f
environmental impact assessment procedures and practices
i
n
B
ang
l
a
d
es
h
.
I
mpact assessment an
d
pro
j
ect appra
i
sa
l
, v.
22
, n. 1, p.
63
-7
8
,
200
4.
ALL
O
WAY, B. J.; AYRE
S
, D.
C
.
C
hemical principles o
f
environmental pollution.
L
on
d
on:
Bl
ac
ki
e
A
ca
d
em
i
c
&
Pro
f
essional, 1993.
ALT
O
N,
C
.
C
.; UNDERW
OO
D, P. B.
L
et us ma
k
e
i
mpact assessment more access
ibl
e.
E
nv
i
ronmenta
l
impact assessme nt review
, v. 23, p. 141-153, 2003.
w
w
A
NDRÉ
,
P. et al.
L
’évaluation des im
p
acts sur l’environnement. Processus, acteurs et
p
rati
q
ue
p
our un
d
évelo
pp
ement durable
.
2. ed. Montreal, Presses Internationales Polytechni
q
ue, 2003.
A
NDREW
S
, R. L. N. Environmental im
p
act assessment and risk assessment: learning from each other.
In: W
ATHERN
, P. (Or
g
.). Environmental im
p
act assessment
:
t
heory and
p
ractice
.
London: Unwin H
y
man,
1988 .
p
. 85-97
.
A
RM
OUR
, A. Methodological
p
roblems in so cial im
p
act monitoring. Environmental im
p
act assessmen
t
review
, v. 8, p. 249-265, 1988.
w
w
ARNSTEIN
,
S. R. A
l
adder of citizen
p
artici
p
ation.
J
ournal of the american institute of
p
lanners
,
v. 35
,
n. 4,
p
. 216-224, 1
969
.
A
RT
S
,
J. EIA follow-u
p:
on the role of ex
p
ost evaluation in environmental im
p
act assessment.
Gronin
g
en: Geo Press, 1998.
A
RT
S
,
J.
;
C
ALDWELL
,
P.
;
MORRISON-SAUNDERS
,
A
. Environmental im
p
act assessment follow-u
p
:
good
p
ractice and future directions – ndings from a worksho
p
at the IAIA 2
000
Co
nf
e
r
e
n
ce
.Im
p
ac
t
a
ssessment and
p
roject a
pp
raisa
l
,
v. 20, n. 4,
p
. 229-304, 2001
.
A
U
ERBA
CH
,
S. I. et al. Environmental Im
p
act Statements. Science
,
v. 193,
p
. 248, 1976
.
A
WAZ
U
, L. A. M. Análise, avalia
ç
ão e gerenciamento de riscos no processo de avalia
ç
ão de impactos
a
m
b
i
e
n
ta
i
s
. In:
J
U
CHEM
,
P.A. ( Or
g
.). Manual de avalia
ç
ão de impactos ambientais
.
2. ed. Curitiba
,
Instituto Ambiental do Paraná/Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit, 1993.
p
. 3200
-
3
2
5
4.
A
ZIN
G
ER, K. L. Methodology f or develo
p
ing a stakeholder-based external affairs strateg y.
C
IM B
u
ll
et
in
,
p
. 87-93, A
p
ril 1998
.
BA
C
K, P. A. A. Desi
g
nin
g
safet y into dams.
Wate
r
Po
w
er
&
D
a
m
Co
n
st
r
uct
i
on
,
p
. 11-12,
F
e
b
ruary, 1990.
B
AILEY
, J. Environmental impact assessment and management: an underexplored relationship.
Y
Y
Environmental management
, v. 21, n. 3, p. 317-327, 1997.
t
t
B
AILEY
, J.;
Y
Y
H
O
BB
S,
V.
;
M
O
RRI
SO
N-
S
AUNDER
S,
A. Environmental auditin
g
: arti cial waterway
d
eve
l
o
p
ments
i
n
W
estern
Aust
r
alia
.
Journal of environmental management
, v. 34, p. 1-13, 1992.
tt
BALBY
,
C. N
;
NAPOLITANO
,
C. M.
;
FERNANDES
,
E. S. L
.
Us
in
a
te
rm
oe
l
ét
ri
ca
de
P
au
líni
a
. In:
L
IMA
,
A
.
L. B. R.
;
H. R. TEIXEIRA
;
SÁNCHEZ
,
L. E.
(
Or
g
s.
)
.
A
e
f
etividade do processo de avalia
ç
ão de impacto
a
m
bie
n
tal
n
o
Estado
de
S
ão Paulo: uma análise a
p
artir de estudos de caso.
São
P
au
l
o
:
Sec
r
eta
ri
a
do
M
e
i
o
A
m
bi
ente
d
o
E
sta
d
o, 1995.
p
. 67-75
.
B
ALMF
O
RD
,
A. et al. Economic reasons
f
or conservin
g
wild nature.
Sc
i
e
n
ce
,
v.
29
7,
p
.
9
5
0
-
9
5
3
,
2002
.
BAPE
—B
U
REA
U
D’A
U
DIEN
C
E
S
P
U
BLI
QU
E
S
SU
R L’ENVIR
O
NNEMEN
T
.
Le BAPE et la
g
estion des con
its:
bil
an et
p
ers
p
ect
i
ves
.
Québec: BAPE
,
1986 .
_
_____
.
L
a m
édi
at
i
on en env
i
ronnement: une nouve
ll
e approc
h
e
d
u
BAPE
.
Q
uébec: BAPE
,
1994 a.
_
_____
.
R
a
pp
ort
A
nnue
l
1993 -1994
.
S
ainte-Fo
y
: Les Publications du
Q
uébec, 1994b.
BARB
OS
A, R.I.; FEARN
S
IDE, P. M. Erosão do solo na Amaz
ô
nia: estudo de caso na região de A
p
ia
ú
,
R
ora
i
ma
,
B
ras
il
.
Acta Amazonica
v. 30, n. 4, p. 601-613, 2000.
a
AIA - Esp_Libro.indb 457AIA - Esp_Libro.indb 457 18/4/2011 11:15:2718/4/2011 11:15:27
4
58
Avalia
ç
ão de Impacto Ambiental: conceitos e m
é
todo
s
B
AR
O
U
C
H
,
G
.
;
THEY
S,
J.
L
’Environnement dans la n
é
gotiation et l’analyse des
p
rojets:
q
ue
f
aire de
p
lus
q
ue
l
es études d’im
p
act
?
C
ahiers du
G
ERME
S,
v
. 12,
p
. 3-23, 1987.
(
Grou
p
e d’Ex
p
lorations et de Recherches
M
ultidisci
p
linaires sur l’Environnement, Paris.
)
B
ARRA
SS
,
R
.
O
s cientistas precisam escrever
.
S
ão Paulo: T. A. Queiroz
/
Edusp, 1979.
B
ARTHE
S
,
R
.
L
e texte et
l’i
mage
.
Paris: Ed. Paris Mus
é
es, 1986.
B
AXTER, W.; R
OSS
, W. A.;
S
PALIN
G
, H. Improving the practice o
f
cumulative e
ff
ects assessment in
C
anada.
I
mpact assessment an
d
pro
j
ect appra
i
sa
l
,
v
. 1
9
, n. 4, p.
2
5
3
-
262
,
200
1.
B
E
ANLAND
S
,
G
.
S
coping methods and baseline studies in EIA. In:
W
ATHERN
, P.
(
Org.
)
.
E
nv
i
ronmenta
l
i
mpact assessment.
Th
eory an
d
pract
i
ce.
L
on
d
on:
U
nw
i
n
H
yman, 1988. p. 31-46.
______
. Environmental assessment requirements at the World Bank. In:
_
S
Á
NCHEZ, L. E.
(
Org.
)
.
A
va
li
ação
d
e
i
mpacto am
bi
enta
l
: s
i
tuação atua
l
e perspect
i
va
s
.
S
ão Paulo: Epusp, 1993a.
p
.
9
1-1
0
1.
______
. Forecasts, uncertainties and the scienti c contents of environmental impact assessment. In:
_
SÁNCHEZ,
L. E. (Or
g
.).
A
valia
ç
ão de impacto ambiental: situa
ç
ão atual e perspectivas
.
São Paulo: E
p
us
p
,
1
993.
p
. 59-65
.
B
E
ANLAND
S
,
G. E.
;
P. N .
D
U
INKE
R
An ecological framework for environmental im
p
act assessment in
Ca
n
ada
. Halifax: Institute for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie Universit
y
, 1983.
B
EC
KER, D. R. et al. A com
p
arison of a technical and a
p
artici
p
atory a
pp
lication of social im
p
act
assess
m
e
n
t
.
I
m
p
act assessment and
p
roject a
pp
raisal
,
v. 22, n. 3,
p
. 177-189, 2004
.
B
EDÊ
,
L. C. et al.
M
anual
p
ara ma
p
eamento de bióto
p
os no Brasil. 2. ed. Belo Horizonte: Funda
ç
ão
A
lexander Brandt
,
1997.
B
E
LLIN
G
ER
,
E. et al. Envir
o
nm
e
n
ta
l
assess
m
e
n
t
in
cou
n
t
ri
es
in
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
.
Buda
p
est: CEU Press, 2000.
B
E
N
SO
N, J. F. What is the alternative? im
p
act assessment tools and sustainable
p
lanning.
I
m
p
act
a
ssessment and
p
roject a
pp
raisal, v. 21, n. 4,
p
. 261-266, 2003
.
B
E
R
G
ER, A. R. The geoindicator conce
p
t and its a
pp
lication: an introduction. In:
B
ERGER
,
A
.R.
;
IAMS
,
W
.J. (Or
g
s.),
Geo
in
d
i
cato
r
s
. Rotterdam, Balkema, 1996.
p
. 1-14.
B
I
N
G
HAM
,
G. Must the Courts Resolve A ll Our Con icts? Phi Ka
pp
a Phi Journa
l
,
p
. 20-21, winter 1989.
B
I
N
G
HA
M
,
G.
;
L
ANDSTAFF
,
L
. M. Alternative dis
p
ute resolution in the NEPA
p
rocess. In: CLARCK
,
R.
;
C
ANTER,
L. (Or
g
s.). Environmental
p
olicy and NEPA. Past,
p
resent and future.
B
oca Raton
,
St. Lucie
P
ress, 1997.
p
. 277-288.
B
ISS
ET, R. A critical survey of methods for environmental im
p
act assessment. In: O’RIORDAN
,
T.
;
T
URNER
,
R.K.
(
Or
g
s.).
An annotated reader in environmental planning and management
. Oxford,
t
t
P
ergamon, 1984a.
p
. 168-186.
______
.
Post develo
p
ment audits to investigate the accuracy o
f
environmental im
p
act
p
redictions.
Z
eitschri
f
t
f
ür Umwelt
p
olitik, v. 7,
p
. 463-484, 1984b.
______
. Development of EIA methods. In: W
_
A
THERN
,
P.
(
Or
g
.
)
.Environmental im
p
act assessment
:
t
heory and
p
ractice. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988.
p
. 47-61
.
B
ITAR
,
O
. Y. et al.
I
n
di
ca
d
ores geo
ló
g
i
co-geot
é
cn
i
cos na recupera
ç
ão am
bi
enta
l
d
e
á
reas
d
egra
d
a
d
a
s
e
m re
gi
ões ur
b
anas
.
In: VIII
CO
N
G
RE
SSO
BRA
S
ILEIR
O
DE
G
E
O
L
OG
IA.
P
o
ç
os de
C
aldas, v. 2, 1993.
A
n
ais
...
p
. 177-183.
B
ITAR
,
O
. Y.
;
C
ERRI
,
L. E.
S
.
;
NAKAZAWA
,
V. A.
C
arta de risco
g
eoló
g
ico e carta
g
eotécnica
:
uma
diferenciação a partir de casos em áreas urbanas no Brasil. In: II SIMPOSIO LATINOAMERIC ANO SOBRE
R
IESGO GEOL
Ó
GICO URBANO
,
1992. Pereira
,
çp
C
olombia.
p
. 35-41
.
B
LOC
K
,
M
.
R
.
I
denti
f
ying environmental aspects and impacts. Milwaukee,
Q
uality Press, 1999
.
BO
FFEY, P. M. Teton dam verdict: a foul-up by the engineers.
Science
v. 195, p. 270-272, 1977.
e
B
OJ
Ó
RQUEZ-TAPIA, L. A.; GARC
Í
A, O. An a
pp
roach
f
or evaluating EIAs – de
ciencies o
f
EIA in Mexico.
Environmental impact assessment review
, v. 18, p. 218-240, 1998.
w
w
BO
M
,
A. E. R.
;
M
O
RAI
S,
N. A.
N
ormas T
é
cnicas para Apresentação de Mapas em Estudos de Impactos
A
m
bie
n
tais
.
I
n:
J
U
C
HEM
,
P. A .
(
Org.
)
.
M
anua
l
d
e ava
li
a
ç
ão
d
e
i
mpactos am
bi
enta
i
s
.
2. ed.
C
uritiba
,
I
nstituto Ambiental do Paraná
/
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit, 1993.
p
.
32
17-
322
1.
AIA - Esp_Libro.indb 458AIA - Esp_Libro.indb 458 18/4/2011 11:15:2718/4/2011 11:15:27
Para continuar leyendo
Solicita tu prueba